This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://johnrose.house.gov/media/press-releases/us-reps-john-rose-and-darren-soto-introduce-bipartisan-black-vulture-relief
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://johnrose.house.gov/media/press-releases/us-reps-john-rose-and-darren-soto-introduce-bipartisan-black-vulture-relief
While I understand the concerns of livestock farmers and ranchers in dealing with black vultures, I have serious reservations about the Black Vulture Relief Act. This bipartisan bill could potentially have negative consequences for migratory bird populations and the environment as a whole. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act was put in place to protect migratory bird species, including black vultures, and we should not be so quick to circumvent it. Instead of allowing livestock producers to take black vultures without a permit, we should be focusing on developing more effective and humane methods to deter vultures from attacking livestock. This includes implementing non-lethal deterrents such as visual and noise-based repellents. I hope that our lawmakers will consider the potential long-term consequences of this bill before moving forward with it.
Thanks for expressing your opinion on this bill! As far as I am aware, this bill only targets Black Vultures. It seems to be a measured response to give farmers a relief from the real harm these birds are causing them and their livestock. Unfortunately “more humane” methods are simply not very effective and carry problems of their own. However, this is a great space to share any concerns with this bill you may have.